<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:02:06 GMT--><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><title>Firstlogic Commercial Mail Blog by Chris Lien</title><subtitle>Home</subtitle><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/</id><link rel="alternate" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/"/><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/atom.xml"/><updated>2006-12-16T16:39:45Z</updated><generator uri="http://www.squarespace.com/" version="Squarespace Site Server v4.1.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)">Squarespace</generator><entry><title>Yes, Virginia, There Is A Postal Reform Bill</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/12/15/yes-virginia-there-is-a-postal-reform-bill.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/12/15/yes-virginia-there-is-a-postal-reform-bill.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-12-15T21:56:04Z</published><updated>2006-12-15T21:56:04Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>December 15, 2006 </strong></p><p>It took twelve years, but postal reform legislation is only a Presidential signature away from becoming law. In the late hours of Saturday, December 9, the 109<sup>th</sup> Congress was able to finally complete and pass H.R. 6407. This is an historic event, and an amazing effort by all those involved. I personally thought this would not happen during this &ldquo;lame duck&rdquo; session of Congress. Perhaps we&rsquo;re witnessing another <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Festivus" target="_blank">Festivus</a> miracle, despite all the airing of grievances! </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Podcasts and CASS™ Cycle L</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/11/17/podcasts-and-cass-cycle-l.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/11/17/podcasts-and-cass-cycle-l.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-11-17T22:47:05Z</published><updated>2006-11-17T22:47:05Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>November 17, 2006 </strong></p><p>This morning, I had the wonderful opportunity to record my first <a href="http://www.postcom.org/netcasts/11.17.06.podcast.mp3">podcast</a> with Gene DelPolito, the President of the Association for Postal Commerce. During the podcast, Gene and I talked about CASS&trade; Cycle L and the aggressive approach to UAA mail. I wrote about this before in some earlier blog entries as well as some published articles. However, I wanted to also use this blog entry to provide an update on what this cycle is about and some recent clarifications. </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Tightening the Timeline</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/9/28/tightening-the-timeline.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/9/28/tightening-the-timeline.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-09-24T20:58:00Z</published><updated>2006-09-24T20:58:00Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>September 24, 2006 </strong></p><p>A very important date was announced at the National PCC Day event in Dallas, Texas on September 20. Postmaster General Jack Potter stated that the USPS was preparing for a Rate Case implementation date of May 6, 2007. If he is correct, that means the timeline just got much, much tighter. </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>The END as We Know It</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/9/15/the-end-as-we-know-it.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/9/15/the-end-as-we-know-it.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-09-15T17:46:07Z</published><updated>2006-09-15T17:46:07Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>September 15, 2006</strong></p><p><span class="full-image-float-left"><img alt="tiny-music-note.gif" src="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/storage/tiny-music-note.gif" /></span>&nbsp;It&rsquo;s the END of the network as we know it </p><p><span class="full-image-float-left"><img alt="tiny-music-note.gif" src="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/storage/tiny-music-note.gif" /></span>&nbsp;It&rsquo;s the END of the network as we know it </p><p><span class="full-image-float-left"><img alt="tiny-music-note.gif" src="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/storage/tiny-music-note.gif" /></span>&nbsp;It&rsquo;s the END of the network as we know it </p><p><span class="full-image-float-left"><img alt="tiny-music-note.gif" src="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/storage/tiny-music-note.gif" /></span>&nbsp;And I feel fine&hellip;&hellip;</p><p>Okay, maybe not everyone feels fine about END. I just couldn&rsquo;t resist using that R.E.M. song! END stands for Evolutionary Network Design and represents the latest initiative by the USPS<sup>&reg;</sup> to restructure their delivery network to reflect current demographics, transportation changes, and the deployment of postal automation equipment. This is a massive project, and like many other major initiatives in this industry, this one also has a lot of people concerned. </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Some Assembly Optional</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/8/28/some-assembly-optional.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/8/28/some-assembly-optional.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-08-28T16:10:24Z</published><updated>2006-08-28T16:10:24Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p>There have been a lot of comments lately on postal worksharing discounts leveraged by &ldquo;big mailers&rdquo; and potential changes to the postal delivery network. Postal commentator <a href="http://www.postcom.org/public/articles/2006articles/The.Price.Of.Being.Obstreperous.htm" target="_blank">Gene Del Polito</a> and the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) president <a href="http://www.postcom.org/public/2006/burrus.letter.08.06.pdf" target="_blank">William Burrus</a> recently exchanged their views on heated topics such as Evolutionary Network Design (END) as well as their positions on worksharing discounts for bulk mailers. And just the other day, <a href="http://www.postalnewsblog.com/2006/08/22/do-postal-employees-hate-their-customers/" target="_blank">Brian Sheehan</a>, editor of PostalNews.com, posted his views and posed the question &ldquo;Do postal employees hate their customers?&rdquo;</p><p>Since not everyone is familiar with the details in such hotly debated topics as Postal Reform, END, and the pending Rate Case, I thought I&rsquo;d take a moment to perhaps explain what one of these contentious issues is all about: worksharing discounts. And fortunately, I stumbled upon an example earlier this summer while shopping at a local retail store.</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Drawing The Barcode Line</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/8/15/drawing-the-barcode-line.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/8/15/drawing-the-barcode-line.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-08-11T14:32:25Z</published><updated>2006-08-11T14:32:25Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>August 11, 2006 </strong></p><p>Mark your calendars now; effective January 2009, the 4-state barcode (aka 4-CB, aka OneCode) will be the official barcode for automation compatible letters and flats mail handled by the United States Postal Service&reg;. This barcode will replace the Postnet code, Planet Code&reg;, and Address Change Service codes currently used today. </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>New MTAC Workgroups</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/7/24/new-mtac-workgroups.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/7/24/new-mtac-workgroups.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-07-25T01:56:03Z</published><updated>2006-07-25T01:56:03Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>July 24, 2006 </strong></p><p>The Mailers Technical Advisory Committee is meeting again next week, August 1 &ndash; 3, at USPS<sup>&reg;</sup> headquarters in Washington, DC. These are the quarterly meetings whereby industry and USPS representatives work together on various workgroups, striving to improve overall mail deliverability and reduce mailing costs. This quarter&rsquo;s meetings also bring a few new initiatives to the table.</p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>“Just Plain Dumb” Or Another Instance Of PKR?</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/7/21/just-plain-dumb-or-another-instance-of-pkr.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/7/21/just-plain-dumb-or-another-instance-of-pkr.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-07-21T14:43:18Z</published><updated>2006-07-21T14:43:18Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>July 21, 2006 </strong></p><p>I was taking a look the other day at Frank Dravis&rsquo; blog (<a href="http://weblogs.firstlogic.com/dravis/">http://weblogs.firstlogic.com/dravis/</a>) and his recent entry, &ldquo;Just Plain Dumb&rdquo;, caught my eye. In the entry, Frank talks about how continued solicitations from a financial company were not only irritating him, but were also perplexing. It turns out that Frank&rsquo;s name and address, including the firm name of Postalsoft, are still turning up on a direct marketing list and standard mail pieces are still showing up in his mailbox bearing information that was outdated over 17 years ago. </p><p>There are likely a number of reasons why this mail continues to arrive at his door. Perhaps the information really is that outdated in the direct marketer&rsquo;s database. Perhaps the information is on a rented list that just never received an update. Or perhaps it&rsquo;s the result of some strange merge/purge. It&rsquo;s hard to say, but that&rsquo;s not what really caught my eye in his posting. </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>Continued Commitment to Commercial Mail</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/7/7/continued-commitment-to-commercial-mail.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/7/7/continued-commitment-to-commercial-mail.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-07-07T16:34:06Z</published><updated>2006-07-07T16:34:06Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>July 7, 2006 </strong></p><p>For the mailing industry, the only thing constant is change. Rates change, mail preparation rules change, addresses change, certifications change, and sometimes companies change ownership. We&rsquo;ve certainly seen a lot of mergers and acquisitions in this industry and as you know Firstlogic has had some changes as well. However, despite now being called Business Objects, we have not changed our commitment to the commercial mailing industry. In fact, our Postalsoft<sup>&reg;</sup> legacy is as strong as ever. I wanted to use this week&rsquo;s blog entry to update you on some recent activities to hopefully affirm our commitment to our customers and the industry. </p>]]></summary></entry><entry><title>An Aggressive Approach to UAA Mail</title><id>http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/5/26/an-aggressive-approach-to-uaa-mail.html</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://postalsoftblog.businessobjects.com/lien/2006/5/26/an-aggressive-approach-to-uaa-mail.html"/><author><name>Chris Lien</name></author><published>2006-05-26T16:00:10Z</published><updated>2006-05-26T16:00:10Z</updated><summary type="html" xml:lang="en-US"><![CDATA[<p><strong>May 26, 2006 </strong></p><p>If you&rsquo;ve read my columns or attended any of the half-dozen PCC (<a href="http://www.usps.com/nationalpcc/welcome.htm">http://www.usps.com/nationalpcc/welcome.htm</a>)&nbsp;events I speak at each year, you&rsquo;ve probably learned that I am pretty passionate about reducing undeliverable as addressed mail (UAA). UAA mail is not only costing the USPS $1.8 billion each year, it&rsquo;s a significant contributor to the industry&rsquo;s costs and mail pieces that never reach their intended recipients. In fact, it&rsquo;s such a pervasive problem that the Postmaster General Jack Potter specifically called for a reduction of UAA mail by 50% by the year 2010. </p><p>To meet this aggressive goal, the USPS has recently proposed not only rate changes in the recent rate case filing on May 3, but also a significant change to the CASS certified software. Effective August 1, 2007, all CASS certified software will have to verify that the primary address number is <em>truly</em> deliverable in order to qualify for postage automation discounts. In effect, the USPS is cracking down on UAA mail by making a key part of the currently optional Delivery Point Validation (DPV) mandatory.</p>]]></summary></entry></feed>